Tips for søkere

På en workshop i Budapest 21. januar 2009 delte en gruppe på 36 evaluatorer sine erfaringer. Her er deres tips

The most important do’s and don’ts for applicants

  • Read the work programme thoroughly.
  • Be very specific and focused rather than too broad and too ambitious and give concrete examples.
  • Be careful when ‘recycling’ a former proposal (copy/paste), you might end up with something inconsistent.
  • Do not underestimate the importance of the criterion ‘impact’. The impact section should be elaborated and covered very well.
  • Show (in 10 pages or less) you know the state of the art and show you go beyond it.
  • Proofread your own proposal and let a colleague read it.
  • Try to read and score your proposal in 2 hours like the evaluators do.
  • Write a proposal because you have an idea – not because there is an open call.
  • Give it to an English speaker for linguistic corrections.
  • Be up front and do not try to hide anything.
  • Show you really can achieve the objectives.
  • Elaborate what each partner is doing.
  • Expose that the project is European and not national and how it will add value to the EU.
What aspects of a proposal prompt you to “deduct” points?
  • If someone feels too confident on his own impact and importance and constitutes that he will solve everything and the project will be good for everyone.
  • If the technical part is not well supported by literature.
  • If the consortium is poor or too big and fails to show how the members will work together.
  • If one is being too generic and gives unsubstantiated statements. That leads to a lack of clarity.
  • If the project is to low-risk.
  • If the scope of the proposal is too narrow and covers only a very small part of the work programme.
  • If there is a lack of detail of what will be done after the project.
  • If there are discrepancies between the work plan and what they have said they will do.

Merk også at evaluatorene rapporterte at de typisk bruker 2 timer på en STREP søknad og 3 timer på en IP. Det er kritisk at søknaden er klar og lettlest. Bruk tabeller og diagrammer for å hjelpe evaluatoren fange hovedpoengene raskt.   

 

Sammendrag av foreløpige evalueringsresultater for de to første utlysningene i ICT programmet

Evaluation results

  • Retained = Innstilt til finansiering
  • Reserve = Reserveliste
  • Other = Avslått grunnet lavt score eller budsjettbegrensning

Proposals(NO)

  • NO = Forslag med norsk deltakelse
  • Other = Forslag uten norsk deltakelse

Evaluation results(NO) = Evalueringsresultater for forslag med norsk deltakelse

Europakart

  • Mørkere farge = Høyere verdier
  • Lysere farge = Lavere verdier


































 euforskning.no er en uoffisiell blog med fokus på IKT forskning og ICT programmet. Kontakt: pib@rcn.no.

Offisiell informasjon om EU forskning innen IKT området finnes blant annet her: